He asked himself a question in the car in September and he has not been able to unask it.
If I stepped down on Friday, who is still here on Monday?
He is fifty five and he has held the same office for twenty years, and he is good at it, and he has never once used it badly, and that is worth saying because there is a version of this man who has and this is not him.
The question is not bitter. He would push back if you called it that. He is not a man collecting grievances and he could name forty people this week who have been kind to him.
It is that after twenty years he can no longer perform the separation.
Every relationship he has runs through the office in some way. The people he sees most are the ones he works with. The people who ring him ring him about something. The invitations come to the office and are addressed to it, and even the warm ones, the genuinely warm ones from people who love him, arrive shaped by what he does.
He does not doubt that people are fond of him. He doubts that anybody has ever had the opportunity to want him, because there has been no version of him available for twenty years that was not carrying the office in with him.
There was a moment in a front room in September with four friends in it, which is where the car question came from. Somebody said something completely ordinary, that they were glad he had come, and he found himself doing an assessment while smiling and nodding. Would they be glad if I were not what I am.
He could not answer it and he could not stop asking it, and he drove home doing the arithmetic on four decent people who had done nothing wrong.
You know the question. Yours may attach to something other than an office. But you know what it is to be so thoroughly identified with a function that you have lost the ability to detect whether anybody is there for you, and to be unable to test it without blowing up your life.

He wanted a city that was stoning Him
Let me name the pit before we go to the verse, because if this becomes an article about identity and role you will recognize the shape of it and stop reading, and you have probably taught it.
The pit is that the question you are asking is unanswerable by design, and you have been trying to answer it for a year. You cannot run the experiment. You cannot remove the office to see what is left, because the removal itself would change every variable, and so you are stuck with a question that has real weight and no possible evidence.
A man in that position needs a sentence from somewhere the office cannot reach.
Here is the verse.
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!Matthew 23:37
Look at who He is wanting, because that is the whole of it for you.
He is not looking at a city that has been useful to Him. He describes it, in the same breath as the wanting, as the place that kills the prophets and stones the ones sent to it.
That is a city with nothing to offer. Not a supporter, not a platform, not a function He needs performing. It has actively harmed the people He sent, and He says out loud that He has wanted, again and again, to gather it.
There is no office anywhere in that sentence. Nothing is being wanted for what it can do.
And then, and I am not going to sand this off: and ye would not.
They did not come. The wanting was real, it was stated, and it was refused, and He grieved it out loud in public. That is why this verse can be trusted by a man who suspects everything warm that comes toward him. Nobody performs grief over a functionary.
Take that in the chair, and know it is not me reassuring a tired man, it is what is written. He wanted a city that was stoning Him, which is a wanting aimed at nothing useful at all. Matthew 23:37 puts the desire in the first person and the record right beside it, and it is the Holy Spirit who gets a word past twenty years of everything arriving through an office, and He is not writing to the office.
You are wanted where the office cannot reach, and you were wanted by somebody who was getting nothing out of it. Matthew 23:37 names the desire over a city that was killing the ones He sent, and it is the Holy Spirit who carries a word like that, and He did not come in through the role.
And here I draw the line this site always draws, in the same breath. God is neither male nor female. Numbers 23:19 says God is not a man, and He is not a woman either; He is spirit. The hen and her chicks is one of the ways Scripture describes Him with a mother's picture beside a father's, and both are His own, and it does not make the Spirit a woman and it does not make God a goddess.
He had not known how much of him was left.
You are wanted where the office cannot reach, and you were wanted by somebody who was getting nothing out of it. Matthew 23:37 has Him naming His desire over a city that was stoning the ones He sent, and it is the Holy Spirit who carries a word like that into a man for whom everything arrives through a role, and He did not come in that way.
That is where a year of unanswerable arithmetic can go, and it is not going to be answered by your friends and it is not their fault that they cannot answer it.
Because the thing you actually need is not evidence about them. It is one relationship that never came through the office at any point, that predates it and does not depend on it and cannot be changed by a resignation on Friday.
He wanted a city that had nothing to give Him and said so out loud before it answered. That is Matthew 23:37 read exactly as it stands, and it is the Holy Spirit who carries that to a man who cannot run his own experiment, and He did not arrive through the office and does not need it there.
And nothing here is a lever. I am not telling you to step down, and I am not telling you not to, and this article has no view on your Friday whatsoever. Using the wanting of God to produce a decision would be exactly the trade you have been living inside for twenty years, and I will not do it.
The question stays open. Who is still there on Monday is a real question and I have not answered it and no page can.
What is written is that there is one who said what He wanted, out loud, first, over people who had given Him nothing but harm, and that sentence does not need the office in the room to be true.
Declare this over yourself
Say these out loud, alone. You are in Christ, and the authority to speak over twenty years of everything arriving through an office is delegated to you in Him; it does not depend on your being able to answer the question, and you cannot. These stand on what is written in Matthew and are carried by the Holy Spirit, not by anything you hold. What He does with the question, and when, is His to decide, and He answers in His own way and in His own timing.
- Question about who is still there on Monday, you are honest and you are not the measure of whether I am wanted, and I put you down in the name of Jesus. Matthew 23:37 says how often would I have gathered, and He said it over a city that was stoning the ones He sent.
- Assessment I run while I am smiling and nodding, you have made a year tiring and you have never produced one finding. It is written that He grieved out loud when they would not come, and His Spirit is the one who carries that word, and He did not come in through the office and does not need it in the room.
- Lord, You are neither male nor female, and You gather like a hen gathers her chicks. I read this verse out loud with my own name in it, in a room with nothing of the office in it, and I am not assessing it afterward.
Matthew 23:37
This message is free, and always will be. There is nothing to unlock, nothing to subscribe to, and nothing you owe for having received it.











































































